Project · UX Research & Mobile Design

A 41-type pollen
forecast, made effortless

Redesigning wetter.com's pollen forecast — and building it from scratch in the mobile apps — so allergy sufferers can read a dense, 41-type, seven-day forecast at a glance and pin the types that matter to them.

Client
wetter.com
Role
Senior UX/UI Designer
Platforms
Web · iOS · Android (new section)
Methods
Interviews · Usability testing
Scope
UX research · IA · Data-viz · Accessibility
UX Research Information architecture Accessibility Data visualization Mobile AI-generated imagery
Pollen forecast redesign — empty saved state, saved & active lists with a coloured level grid, and a plant detail with flowering time
01

Overview

The pollen forecast covers around 41 pollen types, each with a seven-day outlook at four levels — 0 none, 1 low, 2 elevated, 3 high. On the website it needed a redesign; in the mobile apps the section didn't exist at all, so I created it.

I don't have a pollen allergy myself, so I started where it mattered most — by learning from the people who live with one. That research shaped every decision that followed: how to show a lot of data simply, how to let people focus on the few types that affect them, and how to keep it accessible.

02

The problem

A lot of data on a small screen — 41 pollen types × 7 days × 4 levels — for people who only care about a few types, but still need everything within reach.

Allergy sufferers track the specific types that affect them, yet nothing can be hidden — the full picture has to stay available and findable. And levels can't be communicated by colour alone.

What made it hard
  • Dense data — 41 types across 7 days, on a phone.
  • Only a few types matter — but nothing can be hidden.
  • Hard to find — 41 types need real search.
  • Colour alone isn't enough — levels must be accessible.
  • Charts polarise — testing showed a ~50/50 split in who can read them.
  • No mobile section — the apps had none; it had to be built from scratch.
03

Process & decisions

3.1

Learn from the people who live with it

Since I don't have the allergy myself, I ran a broad study with people who do — across ages and severity, from mild seasonal sniffles to reactions that genuinely shape someone's day. Open, experience-based conversations about how they cope today: which app or site they check, what they trust, where it lets them down, and the small decisions pollen drives — whether to open a window, hang the laundry, take medication before heading out, or pick a different route.

Two findings shaped everything. First, people actively track only a few specific types that affect them — but they still want every type available and searchable, so nothing feels hidden. Second, charts split people roughly in half: some read a graph easily and even enjoy it, others find it off-putting and disengage — and you can't tell which kind someone is in advance. That ruled out a chart-first design and pointed to something everyone can read at a glance, paired with the ability to save the handful of types that matter to you.

Interviews Prototype Test variants Refine↻ repeated across rounds
3.2

A grid of squares, not a chart

Instead of a graph, each day's level is a coloured square with the number inside, next to an always-visible legend. Colour, number and position together mean it reads instantly — nothing to decode — and it tested as effortless for nearly every participant. It's accessible by default (never colour alone) and built on the level colour scale from the design system. I tested several screen variants across rounds of research before landing on this one.

Pollen level grid — one coloured, numbered square per day (0 none to 3 high) with the weekday above, readable by colour, number and position at once
3.3

Save what matters — three lists & search

A bookmark mechanic — shaped together with product and colleagues who have allergies — lets people save the types that affect them. A Saved block is pinned at the very top: the first thing you see, which also teaches the save feature. Below it, Active in the next 7 days shows only what's relevant now, not all 41. And All types is a collapsible list that intentionally repeats the others — so no one ever gets lost, and saved types stay flagged. A search bar jumps to a specific type, sticky headers keep the list name and weekdays in view as you scroll (and in search results), and tapping a type opens a bottom sheet with its description.

Empty state
Pollen — empty saved state, a 7-day all-clear, and access to all 41 pollen types
Saved & active
Pollen — saved types (Ahorn, Ambrosia) on a colour-graded 7-day grid, an alerts toggle, and the active list
3.4

A home reminder & knowing the plant

On the app home, a pollen reminder flags when a saved type is running high — so people stay ahead of a bad day even without opening the section. And to help people recognise what actually triggers them, we produced realistic AI-generated images of each plant, one per pollen type.

Pollen detail — plant photo, a plain-language note on why it matters, and a Blütezeit (flowering-time) bar across the year
AI-generated plant imagery — one photo-real image per pollen type, so people can recognise what they actually react to.
abies
abies
acer
acer
aesculus
aesculus
alnus
alnus
ambrosia
ambrosia
artemisia
artemisia
asteraceae
asteraceae
betula
betula
carpinus
carpinus
castanea
castanea
chenopodium
chenopodium
corylus
corylus
cruciferae
cruciferae
cyperaceae
cyperaceae
erica
erica
fagus
fagus
fraxinus
fraxinus
fungus
fungus
galium
galium
humulus
humulus
impatiens
impatiens
juglans
juglans
larix
larix
picea
picea
pinaceae
pinaceae
pinus
pinus
plantago
plantago
platanus
platanus
poaceae
poaceae
populus
populus
quercus
quercus
quercus ilex
quercus ilex
rumex
rumex
salix
salix
sambucus
sambucus
secale
secale
taxus
taxus
tilia
tilia
ulmus
ulmus
urtica
urtica
The insight behind the design

Not a chart — a grid anyone can read

Researching how people read graphs surfaced something I didn't expect: they split almost 50/50. Half read charts comfortably and even enjoy them; the other half find them off-putting — and you can't predict who is who. So I designed one format that works for everyone: a coloured square with the level number inside, and a legend that's always on screen.

0
1
2
3
One format for everyone

Coloured squares with a number and a fixed legend — no axes to parse — tested as clear to nearly all respondents.

Never colour alone

Level is carried by colour, number and a persistent legend — accessible by default, including for colour-vision deficiency.

Relevance without hiding

Saved and active lists surface what matters, while all 41 types stay one search away.

Anticipates the need

Pinning Saved at the top both serves the core task and teaches people they can personalise the view.

04

Outcome

A dense, 41-type forecast that now reads at a glance — with the types that matter pinned on top.

What changed
  • Shipped on web and in both apps — including a section that didn't exist on mobile before.
  • Effortless to read — coloured, numbered squares instead of charts, accessible by default.
  • Personal & findable — saved types pinned on top, active-only view, and search across all 41.
  • Ahead of bad days — a home-screen reminder when a saved type runs high.
How it was built

Research-led and shaped with product — including colleagues who have pollen allergies and now use it daily. They, and users, find the section genuinely convenient. Realistic per-plant imagery was AI-generated to aid recognition.

Swipe or ← → to browse · click to zoom · Esc to close